Ovidio Capitani

The expert on Pope Benedict IX. Continue reading

On Saturday March 17 I was browsing the Internet looking for information about an obscure character, Pope Benedict X, who was elected pontiff in 1058, ruled the Church for a few months, and then was chased out of town by a competing faction. He is not on the official list of popes. Don’t ask why.

I was surprised to find that an Italian website, treccani.it, had a two-page article about him written by a professor of medieval studies at the University of Bologna, Ovidio Capitani. The article, it turns out, was actually an entry in the Enciclopedia dei Papi, a 2,000-page tome that I had not previously even heard of. In fact, every entry in that book is available at treccani.it. It is a good thing, too; the original three-volume set is out of print and is not even available at Amazon.

I soon located a few additional entries by Professor Capitani (including a long one about my favorite pope, Benedict IX), and over that weekend I struggled through the process of translating them. He employed an obtuse style that is notoriously favored by many academics and politicians in Italy. On the other hand, his conclusions were remarkably even-handed and were thoroughly documented. Many of the citations were from foreign journals that I could not possibly get my hands on, and, even if I did, I would need to get someone to translate them for me.

I was so elated with my discovery that I decided to try and get in touch with the professor by e-mail and let him know about my interest in this subject. I was shocked to discover that he had died at the age of 88 on the precise day that I had come across his work, March 17, 2002.

George Noory often says that he does not believe in coincidences. I wonder what he would say about this.

Courtesy Bids

To respond or not? Continue reading

A “courtesy bid” is one made by responder on what would normally be considered insufficient values. The idea is to provide partner a second chance to describe his/her hand. For example, a 1NT response to a bid of one of a major ordinarily requires six points. Some people regularly make this bid with four or five.

I tried to use my database of hand records to determine how often this turned out to be a good idea, but the sample size was surprisingly small — only about a dozen or so out of thousands of hands. The results were roughly equally split between positive and negative.

When I did this, I did not take into account which seat the opening bidder was sitting in. The importance of the seating was brought home to me last week in a club game. I was sitting to the left of the dealer with this fine holding:
♠K5 98762 J43 ♣1076.

After three passes my partner opened 1♠. This was followed by another three passes. 1♠ made two, but that was not enough for us to avoid a zero. At the other tables the dealer overcalled his five-card diamond suit, which gave the opener a chance to show his 18HCP and fine heart suit. He held:
♠AQ932 AKQ5 72 ♣K2.

3 is easy. 4 is makeable if the opponents fail to take two tricks in each minor in the first four tricks. This is not unlikely if partner is playing the contract.

I left grumbling that we had been fixed. However, some reflection made me change my mind. The dealer probably had no more than eleven points; almost everyone opens with twelve these days. Lefty probably had less than ten; he could not find a third-seat bid. So, partner and I must have at least half the deck. I should have responded 1NT because 1) with half the deck and the majority of trumps, we should be safe at the two level; 2) another strain may be better; 3) partner may be looking at a two- or three-suited rock crusher that he did not want to open 2♣.

Note that this reasoning applies no matter how good a hand that responder has. Even if he/she holds a Yarborough, the pair still has half the high-card points. I plan on never passing in this position again, at least with a partner who knows about this tactic.

I have been unable to find anyone who has addressed this issue in print, but the reasoning seems flawless to me. Needless to say, you might get in trouble if dealer has an unbiddable twelve, or lefty has a decent hand with one spade, but those cases should be relatively rare. People today are dying to bid; it is much more likely that partner is sitting on a treasure trove.

The other side of the coin is that when someone in the fourth seat opens, he should be aware that his partner could be very weak. Opener should never jump to game or splinter. A jump shift is enough to show a very strong hand, and it gives responder a chance to apply the brakes.

Older than …

How did I get so old so fast? Continue reading

The members of the Kansas City branch of the Wavada family have pronounced the name WAY-vuh-duh for as long as anyone can remember. It occurred to me the other day that I must be the oldest of the planet’s seven billion odd residents who pronounces his/her last name this way. This just seems terribly wrong.

My understanding is that the more populous Wichita and Spokane branches pronounce it WAY-vuh-day. If there are any other branches, I do not know about them.

It would make me feel a lot better if someone told me about a geezer somewhere who could wrest this title from me.

My Favorite Century

The eleventh century deserves more attention. Continue reading

Every century has produced astounding popes. If I were forced to pick one century on which to concentrate, however, it would definitely be the eleventh.

Gerbert Statue

The statue of Gerbert in Aurillac

The first pope in the eleventh century was Gerbert of Aurillac. Widely known as one of the smartest men in all of Europe, he was hand-picked by the nineteen-year-old Holy Roman Emperor Otto III to become Supreme Pontiff in 999. He took the name Sylvester II because he hoped to emulate the very close relationship that was reportedly enjoyed by the first Christian emperor, Constantine, and the pope at the time, Sylvester I.

Pope Sylvester II was not particularly popular among the Romans. Three factors were working against him:

  1. He was a foreigner. He lived in France and studied in Spain with the Saracens.
  2. He was chosen by the emperor, not the Romans.
  3. He was so clever that he was widely suspected of employing witchcraft.

Otto died under mysterious circumstances in Italy in 2002. The pope only outlasted him by a year. Some people attribute their untimely demises to the work of the Crescentius family, which installed the next three popes: John XVII, John XVIII, and Sergius IV, also known as Peter Pig-snout. All told, they held the papacy for about nine years.

What transpired next is unclear, but somehow Count Gregory of Tusculum, which sat atop the northernmost of the Alban Hills, about fifteen miles south of Rome, supplanted the Crescentius family, to which he was related, as the chief power-broker in Rome. Count Gregory arranged for his son to become Pope Benedict VIII, and Benedict was succeeded by his brother, Pope John XIX. Although both of these pontificates were relatively tranquil and successful, the fact that the two popes received their appointments from their father has been held against them. Nevertheless, it is undeniable that Pope Benedict was instrumental in the expulsion of the Saracens from Italy and that conditions on the peninsula improved markedly during the twenty-year span of the fraternal pontificates.

Pope Benedict IX

The mosaic of Pope Benedict IX in St. Paul’s Outside the Walls

The next pope, who also hailed from Tusculum, was my all-time favorite, Benedict IX. His father was the brother of the two previous pontiffs, and he made sure that his young son got to sit on the Throne of Peter. How young? Well, one chronicler claimed that he was only ten years old, but this is probably a mistake. The best guess is that he was about twice that.

If you look on any list of the popes, you may be surprised to see Pope Benedict IX on it three times. Once he sold the papacy to his godfather, John Gratian, so that he could get married and once he was removed from the papacy by the Holy Roman Emperor. Both times he came back and resumed his pontificate, and the Church has always considered both Benedict and the men who served in his absence as legitimate popes. The last pontificate did not last long. He was expelled in 1048 for the last time by Emperor Henry III.

What happened to Pope Benedict after he was overthrown the last time is disputed. He was still a young man, certainly less than forty years of age. For centuries the monastery at Grottaferrata, which was donated by Benedict’s grandfather, had a plaque that indicated that the former pontiff had died there decades later. Unfortunately the plaque was destroyed in World War II.

Pope Gregory VII

The mosaic of Pope Gregory VII

The emperor controlled the papacy for the next twenty-five years. However, during this time a Tuscan monk named Hildebrand was slowly but surely consolidating his power, and in 1073 he became Pope Gregory VII. His dispute with Emperor Henry IV, who went so far as to install an anti-pope, is extremely famous. The pope excommunicated the emperor, then forgave him, and then waged political and actual war with him for years. The pope invited the Norman count, Robert Guiscard, to help him ward off the emperor. The assistance was granted, but after the battle the Norman troops sacked Rome. The Romans blamed the pope for this debacle, and he spent the last years of his pontificate in exile, but not before designating monks as his two successors.

Clermont

Pope Urban II launched the First Crusade at Clermont

Pope Urban II closed out the century by somehow persuading a good portion of the fighting men of Europe to make the arduous trip to the Middle East to wrest control of Jerusalem from the Muslims. Many thousands died in the effort, but Jerusalem was indeed captured by the soldiers of the First Crusade in July of 1099, just before the death of the pontiff.

Many other interesting events transpired in the eleventh century — the spread of the monasteries, the cults of the saints, the widespread theft of relics, the Great Schism, the Norman conquests, and the reform movement to name a few. Each might make a suitable subject for a post.

The problem is that the contemporaneous accounts that have survived from the period are notoriously unreliable. Many have been shown to be replete with exaggerations and outright lies. Furthermore, most of the population in the eleventh century was illiterate. The only people who were both capable of writing and had access to parchment (paper was not yet in production in Europe) and writing materials were monks and high-level nobles and clergy. Their writings generally reflected their biases.

The Hand Analysis Project

My bridge database. Continue reading

When experts argue in favor of or against a treatment in bridge, they customarily provide a hand that illustrates the point that they are emphasizing. This has always struck me as somewhat odd. There are 635,013,559,600 possible bridge hands. What does one hand prove?

Ideas about what works in bridge and what does not have changed drastically over the fifty or so years that I have been playing. The fact that I took thirty years off in the middle has made this easy to realize. Many of the “truths” that I learned in the sixties are considered silly by most experts today.

On some very important issues there is still no consensus whatever among the experts. I decided that it would be useful to have a database of hands that I could query easily to determine what worked best. The hand records that are often provided at the end of games that use computer generated hands provide a wealth of information. Not only do they show each of the four hands, they also provide the dealer, the vulnerability, and the analysis by Deep Finesse as to what the best contracts are. Many tournaments provide these hand records as pdf files, and hundreds are available over the Internet.

At first I keyed in the results, but this was too labor-intensive for a lazy man like myself. After thinking about this for a while, I devised a process for converting the pdf files downloaded from the Internet into the format of my database. Here is how it (usually) works. 1) I save the pdf file onto my hard drive. 2) I load that file into Adobe Acrobat (not the Reader, the one that you have to pay for). 3) I save it on my hard drive as a postscript file. This is a text file that can be parsed by a program. 4) I run my php program to convert the file to the format of my MySQL database.

The process, which takes only a couple of minutes, results in thirty-six new records on my database. It currently has approximately twenty thousand hands.

Unfortunately, the algorithm is not perfect. Sometimes my copy of Acrobat is not able to read the pdf files. Sometimes my program is not able to parse the postscript file correctly. The latter problem can be fixed if I am willing to put the time into improving the program’s logic, which was built without any documentation of the formats used in creating the pdf files. At present, I do not know what to do about the first issue.

In subsequent posts I will provide some of the results of my queries of the database.